News
Deepen Optoelectronic Resources, Lead Technological Breakthroughs

For precision optical systems, choosing a convex lens based only on diameter and focal length is rarely enough. The term “convex lens” covers several optical geometries, including double convex and plano-convex designs, and their performance can differ significantly even when their nominal focal lengths are similar.

A positive lens is often the natural choice when an optical system needs to focus or converge light, but it cannot solve every beam-control problem. Laser and imaging systems may instead require a controlled increase in beam divergence, a larger beam diameter, or an adjustment that effectively increases the focal length of an existing optical arrangement.

A conventional spherical lens can provide the required optical power, but its simple geometry does not always provide sufficient aberration control in a precision optical system. As aperture increases or the lens is used away from the optical axis, spherical aberration, coma, and degradation toward the edge of the image can become more difficult to manage.

A conventional singlet lens can be sufficient for simple focusing or collimation, but its limitations become more apparent when an optical system must work across multiple wavelengths. Because different wavelengths are refracted by different amounts, blue, green, and red light may form their focal points at different axial positions.

For optical engineers and procurement teams, choosing a plano convex lens is rarely just a matter of selecting a diameter and focal length. A lens that appears simple can produce very different results depending on its material, curvature, surface accuracy, center deviation, coating, and installation direction.

For optical engineers and procurement teams, choosing a plano concave lens is rarely just a matter of selecting a diameter. A lens may need to produce a specific negative focal length, control beam divergence, compensate spherical aberration, or work reliably at a particular wavelength.